Iran’s Supreme Leader: “Irreparable Damage” if US Joins War

The Middle East faces explosive escalation after Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei threatened “irreparable damage” against the United States if it intervenes militarily in Tehran’s conflict with Israel. The warning, broadcast on state television on June 18, 2025, responds directly to U.S. President Donald Trump’s demand for Iran’s “unconditional surrender” amid the sixth consecutive day of missile exchanges. Regional tensions have soared with over 600 confirmed casualties, including 585 Iranian and 24 Israeli civilian deaths, marking the most direct confrontation between the arch-enemies in decades. Khamenei’s defiance signals Tehran’s readiness to broaden the conflict should Washington join Israel’s Operation Rising Lion strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities.

Defiance in the Face of Ultimatums

In a nationally televised address, the 85-year-old Supreme Leader declared Iran “will never surrender” to external pressure, framing the nation’s resilience as a spiritual and strategic imperative. “The Iranian nation stands firm against imposed war just as it will stand firm against imposed peace,” Khamenei stated, characterizing Israeli attacks as “foolish and malicious aggression”. His remarks contained a pointed warning to Washington: “Americans should know that any military intervention by America will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage”.

The Supreme Leader dismissed Trump’s personal threats, including the U.S. president’s reference to knowing Khamenei’s location. “Wise people who know Iran, its people, and its history never speak to this nation in the language of threats,” he countered, asserting that Iranians “are not those who surrender”. The message reinforced Iran’s doctrine of resistance against both military coercion and diplomatic pressure, coming hours after Israel destroyed centrifuge production facilities at the Tehran Research Center and Iran Centrifuge Technology Company in Karaj.

The Unconditional Surrender Demand

Khamenei’s address responded to Trump’s extraordinary social media ultimatum issued Tuesday, in which the U.S. president wrote: “We know exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader’ is hiding. He is an easy target but is safe there — We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now”. Trump followed with a one-line demand in all caps: “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” — a term historically associated with total military capitulation.

According to intelligence sources, Trump’s advisors remain divided about direct military involvement. CBS News reported the president is “considering” joining Israeli strikes against hardened nuclear targets like the Fordo enrichment site, which lies 80 meters underground. Only U.S.-owned 30,000-pound “bunker buster” bombs could destroy such facilities, creating operational dependency on American capabilities despite Israel’s advanced arsenal. Political experts note Trump’s surrender terms would require Iran to dismantle its nuclear program, cease missile development, and end support for regional proxies — demands Tehran views as existential humiliation.

Escalating Military Exchanges

The conflict entered a dangerous new phase with Iran’s first deployment of Fattah-1 hypersonic missiles against Tel Aviv, marking a technological escalation that challenges Israeli air defenses. Israel Defense Forces confirmed conducting operations with over 50 fighter jets overnight, targeting missile production facilities near Tehran and Revolutionary Guard-linked universities. Iranian state media reported shooting down an Israeli Hermes drone over Isfahan province, which the IDF acknowledged without confirming intelligence compromise.

Civilian impacts intensified dramatically, with Iran’s Health Ministry reporting at least 585 killed and Israel confirming 24 civilian deaths from missile barrages. Structural damage includes approximately 40 impact sites across Israel, 3,800 evacuations, and nearly 16,000 property damage claims. Israeli officials claim their Iron Dome system intercepted hundreds of projectiles but at unsustainable costs exceeding $250 million nightly, with defense analysts warning of potential depletion within two weeks if attacks continue.

The American Calculus

Behind Trump’s public threats, administration officials reveal intense debates over direct military involvement. CNN reports the president has grown “increasingly warm” to striking Iranian nuclear facilities, representing a significant hawkish shift despite maintaining diplomatic options. This aligns with Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar’s justification letter to the UN, which claimed preemptive strikes were necessary against Iran’s “strategic plan to eliminate Israel”.

Notably, Trump reportedly vetoed an Israeli proposal to assassinate Khamenei, with a U.S. official telling Reuters: “Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do, we’re not even talking about going after the political leadership”. Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu neither confirmed nor denied the plan when questioned, stating only that such actions would “end the conflict” rather than escalate it. The administration’s red lines suggest calibrated escalation aimed at dismantling Iran’s nuclear capabilities without triggering all-out war.

Regional and Global Implications

Khamenei’s “irreparable damage” warning implies asymmetric retaliation strategies should the U.S. intervene, including potential attacks on American bases in Iraq and Syria, energy infrastructure strikes, or naval confrontations in the Persian Gulf. The threat carries particular weight given Iran’s network of proxy forces across Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria, capable of multi-front harassment. Regional analysts warn that U.S. involvement could transform a bilateral conflict into a regional conflagration with global energy market repercussions.

The humanitarian situation continues deteriorating, with Iran reporting overwhelmed hospitals and Israel evacuating thousands from border areas. International organizations face access challenges in conflict zones, while the UN Security Council remains deadlocked on ceasefire resolutions. With diplomatic channels paralyzed, the risk of miscalculation escalates daily as both nations signal readiness for prolonged conflict. The absence of direct communication mechanisms between Washington and Tehran further compounds dangers of unintended escalation.

Conclusion

Ayatollah Khamenei’s threat of “irreparable damage” marks a pivotal moment in the Israel-Iran conflict, establishing clear red lines against U.S. military intervention while rejecting Trump’s surrender ultimatum. As fighting enters its second week, the region balances on a knife’s edge: Israel lacks capability to destroy Iran’s deepest nuclear facilities alone, Iran’s missile arsenals face depletion against Iron Dome defenses, and Washington weighs direct involvement against catastrophic escalation risks. With neither side showing willingness to back down and civilian casualties mounting, the crisis threatens to spiral beyond bilateral conflict into a regional war with global consequences. The coming days will test whether deterrence or destruction prevails as the dominant paradigm in the Middle East’s most dangerous confrontation in decades.

Frequently Asked Questions